2009 Chevrolet Captiva vs. 2005 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Captiva is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Ford Ecosport. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Ford Ecosport would be higher. At 1,990 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Captiva is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Captiva (148 HP) has 39 more horse power than 2005 Ford Ecosport. (109 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Captiva should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford Ecosport.
Because 2009 Chevrolet Captiva is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Ford Ecosport. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Captiva will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet Captiva | 2005 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Captiva | Ecosport |
Year Released | 2009 | 2005 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1990 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 109 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2490 mm |