2009 Chevrolet Captiva vs. 2005 Nissan 350Z

To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Captiva is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Nissan 350Z. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Nissan 350Z would be higher. At 3,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Nissan 350Z is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan 350Z (300 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 165 more horse power than 2009 Chevrolet Captiva. (135 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan 350Z should accelerate faster than 2009 Chevrolet Captiva. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan 350Z weights approximately 203 kg more than 2009 Chevrolet Captiva. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2005 Nissan 350Z is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Nissan 350Z. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Captiva, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan 350Z (372 Nm) has 152 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Chevrolet Captiva. (220 Nm). This means 2005 Nissan 350Z will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Chevrolet Captiva.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Chevrolet Captiva 2005 Nissan 350Z
Make Chevrolet Nissan
Model Captiva 350Z
Year Released 2009 2005
Body Type SUV Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2405 cc 3491 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 135 HP 300 HP
Engine RPM 5000 RPM 3600 RPM
Torque 220 Nm 372 Nm
Engine Bore Size 87.5 mm 96 mm
Engine Stroke Size 100 mm 81 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.6:1 10.3:1
Drive Type Front Rear
Number of Seats 7 seats 2 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1261 kg 1464 kg
Vehicle Length 4640 mm 4310 mm
Vehicle Width 1760 mm 1820 mm
Vehicle Height 1860 mm 1320 mm
Wheelbase Size 2710 mm 2540 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 9.1 L/100km 10.7 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 65 L 76 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]