2009 Chevrolet Captiva vs. 2006 Mazda 5

To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Captiva is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mazda 5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mazda 5 would be higher. At 2,405 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Captiva is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 5 (157 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 2009 Chevrolet Captiva. (134 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 5 should accelerate faster than 2009 Chevrolet Captiva.

Because 2009 Chevrolet Captiva is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Mazda 5. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Captiva will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chevrolet Captiva (220 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda 5. (201 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2009 Chevrolet Captiva will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda 5.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Chevrolet Captiva 2006 Mazda 5
Make Chevrolet Mazda
Model Captiva 5
Year Released 2009 2006
Body Type SUV Minivan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2405 cc 2262 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 134 HP 157 HP
Engine RPM 5000 RPM 6500 RPM
Torque 220 Nm 201 Nm
Torque RPM 2200 RPM 4500 RPM
Engine Bore Size 87.5 mm 87.1 mm
Engine Stroke Size 100 mm 94 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.6:1 9.7:1
Drive Type 4WD Front
Number of Seats 7 seats 6 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Length 4640 mm 4620 mm
Vehicle Width 1760 mm 1760 mm
Vehicle Height 1860 mm 1640 mm
Wheelbase Size 2710 mm 2760 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 7.8 L/100km 9.8 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 65 L 60 L