2009 Chevrolet Captiva vs. 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLS
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Captiva is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLS would be higher. At 6,208 cc, 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLS weights approximately 659 kg more than 2009 Chevrolet Captiva.
Because 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Captiva, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLS (630 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 410 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Chevrolet Captiva. (220 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Chevrolet Captiva. 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLS has automatic transmission and 2009 Chevrolet Captiva has manual transmission. 2009 Chevrolet Captiva will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet Captiva | 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLS | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Captiva | CLS |
Year Released | 2009 | 2008 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2405 cc | 6208 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 135 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 220 Nm | 630 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 102.2 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 94.6 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 11.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1261 kg | 1920 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1400 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1860 mm | 1880 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2860 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.1 L/100km | 12 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 80 L |