2009 Chevrolet Captiva vs. 2009 Mazda BT-50

To start off, both 2009 Chevrolet Captiva and 2009 Mazda BT-50 were released in the same year (2009). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 2,953 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda BT-50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda BT-50 (154 HP @ 3200 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 2009 Chevrolet Captiva. (134 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda BT-50 should accelerate faster than 2009 Chevrolet Captiva.

Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda BT-50 (380 Nm @ 180 RPM) has 160 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Chevrolet Captiva. (220 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda BT-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Chevrolet Captiva.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Chevrolet Captiva 2009 Mazda BT-50
Make Chevrolet Mazda
Model Captiva BT-50
Year Released 2009 2009
Body Type SUV Pickup
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2405 cc 2953 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 134 HP 154 HP
Engine RPM 5000 RPM 3200 RPM
Torque 220 Nm 380 Nm
Torque RPM 2200 RPM 180 RPM
Engine Bore Size 87.5 mm 96.1 mm
Engine Stroke Size 100 mm 102 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.6:1 18.0:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type 4WD 4WD
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 7 seats 2 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Height 1860 mm 1810 mm
Wheelbase Size 2710 mm 3010 mm