2009 Chevrolet Captiva vs. 2011 Nissan Micra
To start off, 2011 Nissan Micra is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Chevrolet Captiva. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Chevrolet Captiva would be higher. At 1,990 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Captiva is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Captiva (148 HP) has 69 more horse power than 2011 Nissan Micra. (79 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Captiva should accelerate faster than 2011 Nissan Micra.
Because 2009 Chevrolet Captiva is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Nissan Micra. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Captiva will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chevrolet Captiva (320 Nm) has 212 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Nissan Micra. (108 Nm). This means 2009 Chevrolet Captiva will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Nissan Micra.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet Captiva | 2011 Nissan Micra | |
Make | Chevrolet | Nissan |
Model | Captiva | Micra |
Year Released | 2009 | 2011 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1990 cc | 1200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 79 HP |
Torque | 320 Nm | 108 Nm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1666 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1514 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2449 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.5 L/100km | 5.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 46 L |