2009 Chevrolet Captiva vs. 2012 Nissan Pixo
To start off, 2012 Nissan Pixo is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Chevrolet Captiva. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Chevrolet Captiva would be higher. At 2,405 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Captiva is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Captiva (134 HP) has 66 more horse power than 2012 Nissan Pixo. (68 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Captiva should accelerate faster than 2012 Nissan Pixo.
Because 2009 Chevrolet Captiva is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Nissan Pixo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Captiva will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet Captiva | 2012 Nissan Pixo | |
Make | Chevrolet | Nissan |
Model | Captiva | Pixo |
Year Released | 2009 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2405 cc | 996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 134 HP | 68 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 184 km/hour | 155 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 11.5 seconds | 13.5 seconds |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 3580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1860 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2360 mm |