2009 Chevrolet Captiva vs. 2013 Mini Cooper
To start off, 2013 Mini Cooper is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Chevrolet Captiva. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Chevrolet Captiva would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chevrolet Captiva weights approximately 76 kg more than 2013 Mini Cooper.
Because 2013 Mini Cooper is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Mini Cooper. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Captiva, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chevrolet Captiva (220 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mini Cooper. (155 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 2009 Chevrolet Captiva will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mini Cooper.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet Captiva | 2013 Mini Cooper | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mini |
Model | Captiva | Cooper |
Year Released | 2009 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 135 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 220 Nm | 155 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 85 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1261 kg | 1185 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 3723 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1892 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1860 mm | 1407 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2467 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 50 L |