2009 Chevrolet Captiva vs. 2013 Mini Roadster
To start off, 2013 Mini Roadster is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Chevrolet Captiva. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Chevrolet Captiva would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chevrolet Captiva weights approximately 600 kg more than 2013 Mini Roadster.
Because 2009 Chevrolet Captiva is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Mini Roadster. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Captiva will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mini Roadster (260 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Chevrolet Captiva. (220 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2013 Mini Roadster will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Chevrolet Captiva.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet Captiva | 2013 Mini Roadster | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mini |
Model | Captiva | Roadster |
Year Released | 2009 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 134 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 220 Nm | 260 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1845 kg | 1245 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 3734 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1892 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1860 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2467 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 50 L |