2009 Chevrolet Cobalt vs. 1953 Humber Pullman
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Cobalt is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Humber Pullman. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Humber Pullman would be higher. At 4,138 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Humber Pullman is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Cobalt (260 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 144 more horse power than 1953 Humber Pullman. (116 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Cobalt should accelerate faster than 1953 Humber Pullman. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Humber Pullman weights approximately 879 kg more than 2009 Chevrolet Cobalt.
Because 1953 Humber Pullman is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Humber Pullman. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Cobalt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chevrolet Cobalt (353 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 67 more torque (in Nm) than 1953 Humber Pullman. (286 Nm @ 1400 RPM). This means 2009 Chevrolet Cobalt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1953 Humber Pullman.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet Cobalt | 1953 Humber Pullman | |
Make | Chevrolet | Humber |
Model | Cobalt | Pullman |
Year Released | 2009 | 1953 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 4138 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 260 HP | 116 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 353 Nm | 286 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 1400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.6 mm | 88.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 111.1 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 7.1:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1261 kg | 2140 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 5290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 3330 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 49 L | 68 L |