2009 Chevrolet Cobalt vs. 1954 Isuzu Minx
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Cobalt is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Isuzu Minx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Isuzu Minx would be higher. At 2,198 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Cobalt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Cobalt (153 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 116 more horse power than 1954 Isuzu Minx. (37 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Cobalt should accelerate faster than 1954 Isuzu Minx. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chevrolet Cobalt weights approximately 301 kg more than 1954 Isuzu Minx. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1954 Isuzu Minx is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Isuzu Minx. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Cobalt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet Cobalt | 1954 Isuzu Minx | |
Make | Chevrolet | Isuzu |
Model | Cobalt | Minx |
Year Released | 2009 | 1954 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2198 cc | 1265 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 153 HP | 37 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque RPM | 4900 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1261 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1580 mm |