2009 Chevrolet Cobalt vs. 1956 DKW Munga
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Cobalt is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 DKW Munga would be higher. At 2,198 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Cobalt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Cobalt (153 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 116 more horse power than 1956 DKW Munga. (37 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Cobalt should accelerate faster than 1956 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 DKW Munga weights approximately 19 kg more than 2009 Chevrolet Cobalt.
Because 1956 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Chevrolet Cobalt. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1956 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chevrolet Cobalt (150 Nm @ 4900 RPM) has 79 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 DKW Munga. (71 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Chevrolet Cobalt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 DKW Munga.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet Cobalt | 1956 DKW Munga | |
Make | Chevrolet | DKW |
Model | Cobalt | Munga |
Year Released | 2009 | 1956 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2198 cc | 896 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 153 HP | 37 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 150 Nm | 71 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4900 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1261 kg | 1280 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 3450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1820 mm |