2009 Chevrolet Cobalt vs. 1960 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Cobalt is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Ford Falcon would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chevrolet Cobalt weights approximately 630 kg more than 1960 Ford Falcon.
Because 1960 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Cobalt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Chevrolet Cobalt | 1960 Ford Falcon | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
| Model | Cobalt | Falcon |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 155 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1750 kg | 1120 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4610 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2710 mm |
