2009 Chevrolet Cobalt vs. 1963 DKW F 11
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Cobalt is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW F 11. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW F 11 would be higher. At 2,201 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Cobalt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Cobalt (155 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 117 more horse power than 1963 DKW F 11. (38 HP @ 4300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Cobalt should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW F 11. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chevrolet Cobalt weights approximately 1000 kg more than 1963 DKW F 11. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Chevrolet Cobalt | 1963 DKW F 11 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | DKW |
| Model | Cobalt | F 11 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2201 cc | 889 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 155 HP | 38 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 4300 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 4900 RPM | 2250 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 7.3:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1750 kg | 750 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 3970 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1580 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2260 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 49 L | 31 L |
