2009 Chevrolet Cobalt vs. 1963 Pontiac Tempest
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Cobalt is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Pontiac Tempest. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Pontiac Tempest would be higher. At 3,524 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Pontiac Tempest is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Cobalt (261 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 143 more horse power than 1963 Pontiac Tempest. (118 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Cobalt should accelerate faster than 1963 Pontiac Tempest. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Pontiac Tempest weights approximately 89 kg more than 2009 Chevrolet Cobalt.
Because 1963 Pontiac Tempest is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Pontiac Tempest. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Cobalt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet Cobalt | 1963 Pontiac Tempest | |
Make | Chevrolet | Pontiac |
Model | Cobalt | Tempest |
Year Released | 2009 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 3524 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 261 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1261 kg | 1350 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 5160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2930 mm |