2009 Chevrolet Cobalt vs. 1963 Renault 4
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Cobalt is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Renault 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Renault 4 would be higher. At 2,201 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Cobalt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Cobalt (155 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 122 more horse power than 1963 Renault 4. (33 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Cobalt should accelerate faster than 1963 Renault 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chevrolet Cobalt weights approximately 1100 kg more than 1963 Renault 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet Cobalt | 1963 Renault 4 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Renault |
Model | Cobalt | 4 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2201 cc | 747 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 155 HP | 33 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1750 kg | 650 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 3670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 49 L | 38 L |