2009 Chevrolet Cobalt vs. 1965 Ferrari 512 F1
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Cobalt is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Ferrari 512 F1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Ferrari 512 F1 would be higher. At 2,198 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Cobalt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Ferrari 512 F1 (223 HP @ 12000 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 2009 Chevrolet Cobalt. (153 HP @ 6100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Ferrari 512 F1 should accelerate faster than 2009 Chevrolet Cobalt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chevrolet Cobalt weights approximately 771 kg more than 1965 Ferrari 512 F1.
Because 1965 Ferrari 512 F1 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Ferrari 512 F1. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Cobalt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet Cobalt | 1965 Ferrari 512 F1 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ferrari |
Model | Cobalt | 512 F1 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2198 cc | 1496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 153 HP | 223 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 12000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1261 kg | 490 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 3960 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 700 mm |