2009 Chevrolet Cobalt vs. 1967 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Cobalt is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Cobalt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Cobalt (261 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 168 more horse power than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Cobalt should accelerate faster than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chevrolet Cobalt weights approximately 321 kg more than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chevrolet Cobalt (353 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 220 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2009 Chevrolet Cobalt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet Cobalt | 1967 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Cobalt | Cosmo |
Year Released | 2009 | 1967 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 1964 cc |
Horse Power | 261 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 353 Nm | 133 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1261 kg | 940 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1170 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2210 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 49 L | 57 L |