2009 Chevrolet Cobalt vs. 1968 Ford Fairlane

To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Cobalt is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 5,766 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Cobalt (155 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 1968 Ford Fairlane. (152 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Cobalt should accelerate faster than 1968 Ford Fairlane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chevrolet Cobalt weights approximately 350 kg more than 1968 Ford Fairlane. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1968 Ford Fairlane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Ford Fairlane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Cobalt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Chevrolet Cobalt 1968 Ford Fairlane
Make Chevrolet Ford
Model Cobalt Fairlane
Year Released 2009 1968
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2201 cc 5766 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 155 HP 152 HP
Engine RPM 6100 RPM 4600 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Number of Doors 2 doors 3 doors
Vehicle Weight 1750 kg 1400 kg
Vehicle Length 4590 mm 5110 mm
Vehicle Width 1730 mm 1970 mm
Vehicle Height 1420 mm 1040 mm
Wheelbase Size 2630 mm 2960 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 49 L 40 L