2009 Chevrolet Cobalt vs. 1998 Rover 75

To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Cobalt is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Rover 75. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Rover 75 would be higher. At 2,201 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Cobalt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Cobalt (155 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1998 Rover 75. (150 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Cobalt should accelerate faster than 1998 Rover 75. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Rover 75 weights approximately 189 kg more than 2009 Chevrolet Cobalt.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chevrolet Cobalt (203 Nm @ 4900 RPM) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Rover 75. (185 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2009 Chevrolet Cobalt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Rover 75.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Chevrolet Cobalt 1998 Rover 75
Make Chevrolet Rover
Model Cobalt 75
Year Released 2009 1998
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2201 cc 1950 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 155 HP 150 HP
Engine RPM 6100 RPM 6500 RPM
Torque 203 Nm 185 Nm
Torque RPM 4900 RPM 4000 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 9.3:1 10.5:1
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1261 kg 1450 kg
Vehicle Length 4590 mm 4750 mm
Vehicle Width 1730 mm 1780 mm
Vehicle Height 1460 mm 1430 mm
Wheelbase Size 2630 mm 2750 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 49 L 66 L