2009 Chevrolet Cobalt vs. 2003 Volkswagen Bora
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Cobalt is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Volkswagen Bora. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Volkswagen Bora would be higher. At 2,201 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Cobalt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Cobalt (156 HP) has 67 more horse power than 2003 Volkswagen Bora. (89 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Cobalt should accelerate faster than 2003 Volkswagen Bora.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet Cobalt | 2003 Volkswagen Bora | |
Make | Chevrolet | Volkswagen |
Model | Cobalt | Bora |
Year Released | 2009 | 2003 |
Body Type | Coupe | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2201 cc | 1900 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 156 HP | 89 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 6.4 L/100km | 4.9 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 9.4 L/100km | 5.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 49 L | 55 L |