2009 Chevrolet Cobalt vs. 2006 Fiat Croma
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Cobalt is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Fiat Croma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Fiat Croma would be higher. At 2,201 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Cobalt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Cobalt (156 HP) has 11 more horse power than 2006 Fiat Croma. (145 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Cobalt should accelerate faster than 2006 Fiat Croma. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Fiat Croma weights approximately 114 kg more than 2009 Chevrolet Cobalt.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 203 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet Cobalt | 2006 Fiat Croma | |
Make | Chevrolet | Fiat |
Model | Cobalt | Croma |
Year Released | 2009 | 2006 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2201 cc | 2197 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 156 HP | 145 HP |
Torque | 203 Nm | 203 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1261 kg | 1375 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2830 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.8 L/100km | 999.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 49 L | 62 L |