2009 Chevrolet Cobalt vs. 2011 Nissan Micra
To start off, 2011 Nissan Micra is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Chevrolet Cobalt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Chevrolet Cobalt would be higher. At 2,201 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Cobalt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Cobalt (156 HP) has 77 more horse power than 2011 Nissan Micra. (79 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Cobalt should accelerate faster than 2011 Nissan Micra.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chevrolet Cobalt (203 Nm) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Nissan Micra. (108 Nm). This means 2009 Chevrolet Cobalt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Nissan Micra.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet Cobalt | 2011 Nissan Micra | |
Make | Chevrolet | Nissan |
Model | Cobalt | Micra |
Year Released | 2009 | 2011 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2201 cc | 1200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 156 HP | 79 HP |
Torque | 203 Nm | 108 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1666 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1514 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2449 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.8 L/100km | 5.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 49 L | 46 L |