2009 Chevrolet Colorado vs. 1966 DKW Munga
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Colorado is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DKW Munga would be higher. At 3,700 cc (5 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Colorado (242 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 199 more horse power than 1966 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Colorado should accelerate faster than 1966 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 DKW Munga weights approximately 5 kg more than 2009 Chevrolet Colorado.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet Colorado | 1966 DKW Munga | |
Make | Chevrolet | DKW |
Model | Colorado | Munga |
Year Released | 2009 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3700 cc | 978 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 242 HP | 43 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque RPM | 4600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1105 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 3450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2010 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 31 L |