2009 Chevrolet Colorado vs. 1969 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Colorado is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,230 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chevrolet Colorado weights approximately 285 kg more than 1969 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow.
Because 2009 Chevrolet Colorado is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Colorado will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Chevrolet Colorado | 1969 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | Colorado | Silver Shadow |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1969 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2901 cc | 6230 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 186 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2385 kg | 2100 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4890 mm | 5180 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 3040 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 15.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 109 L |
