2009 Chevrolet Colorado vs. 2004 Rolls-Royce 100
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Colorado is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Rolls-Royce 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Rolls-Royce 100 would be higher. At 8,998 cc (16 cylinders), 2004 Rolls-Royce 100 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Rolls-Royce 100 weights approximately 255 kg more than 2009 Chevrolet Colorado.
Because 2009 Chevrolet Colorado is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Rolls-Royce 100. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Colorado will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2004 Rolls-Royce 100 has automatic transmission and 2009 Chevrolet Colorado has manual transmission. 2009 Chevrolet Colorado will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Rolls-Royce 100 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet Colorado | 2004 Rolls-Royce 100 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Rolls-Royce |
Model | Colorado | 100 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2901 cc | 8998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 16 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 186 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2385 kg | 2640 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4890 mm | 5680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 2000 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 3480 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 80 L |