2009 Chevrolet Corvette vs. 1948 Studebaker Commander
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Corvette is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Studebaker Commander. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Studebaker Commander would be higher. At 7,011 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Corvette is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Corvette (505 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 411 more horse power than 1948 Studebaker Commander. (94 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Corvette should accelerate faster than 1948 Studebaker Commander. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chevrolet Corvette weights approximately 37 kg more than 1948 Studebaker Commander. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet Corvette | 1948 Studebaker Commander | |
Make | Chevrolet | Studebaker |
Model | Corvette | Commander |
Year Released | 2009 | 1948 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7011 cc | 3703 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 505 HP | 94 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Top Speed | 315 km/hour | 137 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1495 kg | 1458 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 5200 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 3030 mm |