2009 Chevrolet Cruze vs. 1964 Wartburg 312
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Cruze is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Wartburg 312. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Wartburg 312 would be higher. At 1,599 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Cruze is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Cruze (110 HP) has 74 more horse power than 1964 Wartburg 312. (36 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Cruze should accelerate faster than 1964 Wartburg 312.
Because 2009 Chevrolet Cruze is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Chevrolet Cruze. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 Wartburg 312, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chevrolet Cruze (142 Nm) has 61 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Wartburg 312. (81 Nm). This means 2009 Chevrolet Cruze will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Wartburg 312.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Chevrolet Cruze | 1964 Wartburg 312 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Wartburg |
| Model | Cruze | 312 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1599 cc | 900 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 110 HP | 36 HP |
| Torque | 142 Nm | 81 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1580 mm |
