2009 Chevrolet Cruze vs. 1974 Mazda RX-3
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Cruze is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Mazda RX-3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Mazda RX-3 would be higher. At 1,962 cc, 1974 Mazda RX-3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Cruze (110 HP) has 10 more horse power than 1974 Mazda RX-3. (100 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Cruze should accelerate faster than 1974 Mazda RX-3.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chevrolet Cruze (142 Nm) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Mazda RX-3. (135 Nm). This means 2009 Chevrolet Cruze will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Mazda RX-3.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet Cruze | 1974 Mazda RX-3 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Cruze | RX-3 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1974 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1599 cc | 1962 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 100 HP |
Torque | 142 Nm | 135 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1600 mm |