2009 Chevrolet Cruze vs. 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Cruze is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 3,344 cc (6 cylinders), 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass (160 HP) has 50 more horse power than 2009 Chevrolet Cruze. (110 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass should accelerate faster than 2009 Chevrolet Cruze.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass (251 Nm) has 109 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Chevrolet Cruze. (142 Nm). This means 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Chevrolet Cruze.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet Cruze | 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Chevrolet | Oldsmobile |
Model | Cruze | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2009 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1599 cc | 3344 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 160 HP |
Torque | 142 Nm | 251 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1770 mm |