2009 Chevrolet Cruze vs. 1993 Mazda 323

To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Cruze is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Mazda 323 would be higher. At 1,599 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Cruze is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Cruze (110 HP) has 36 more horse power than 1993 Mazda 323. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Cruze should accelerate faster than 1993 Mazda 323.

Because 2009 Chevrolet Cruze is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Chevrolet Cruze. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1993 Mazda 323, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chevrolet Cruze (142 Nm) has 38 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Mazda 323. (104 Nm). This means 2009 Chevrolet Cruze will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Mazda 323. 2009 Chevrolet Cruze has automatic transmission and 1993 Mazda 323 has manual transmission. 1993 Mazda 323 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Chevrolet Cruze will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: