2009 Chevrolet Cruze vs. 1996 Honda Integra
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Cruze is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Honda Integra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Honda Integra would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Cruze is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2009 Chevrolet Cruze is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Chevrolet Cruze. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Honda Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet Cruze | 1996 Honda Integra | |
Make | Chevrolet | Honda |
Model | Cruze | Integra |
Year Released | 2009 | 1996 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 1834 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 143 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |