2009 Chevrolet Cruze vs. 2003 Renault Megane
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Cruze is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Renault Megane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Renault Megane would be higher. At 1,599 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Cruze is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Renault Megane (118 HP) has 8 more horse power than 2009 Chevrolet Cruze. (110 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Renault Megane should accelerate faster than 2009 Chevrolet Cruze.
Because 2009 Chevrolet Cruze is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Chevrolet Cruze. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Renault Megane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Renault Megane (147 Nm) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Chevrolet Cruze. (142 Nm). This means 2003 Renault Megane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Chevrolet Cruze.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Chevrolet Cruze | 2003 Renault Megane | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Renault |
| Model | Cruze | Megane |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1599 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 110 HP | 118 HP |
| Torque | 142 Nm | 147 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1830 mm |
