2009 Chevrolet Cruze vs. 2013 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2013 Toyota Matrix is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Chevrolet Cruze. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Chevrolet Cruze would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Toyota Matrix (156 HP) has 46 more horse power than 2009 Chevrolet Cruze. (110 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 2009 Chevrolet Cruze.
Because 2013 Toyota Matrix is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Chevrolet Cruze. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Toyota Matrix will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Toyota Matrix (220 Nm) has 78 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Chevrolet Cruze. (142 Nm). This means 2013 Toyota Matrix will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Chevrolet Cruze.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Chevrolet Cruze | 2013 Toyota Matrix | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Toyota |
| Model | Cruze | Matrix |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1599 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 110 HP | 156 HP |
| Torque | 142 Nm | 220 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 4-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1765 mm |
