2009 Chevrolet Epica vs. 1953 Holden FJ
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Epica is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Holden FJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Holden FJ would be higher. At 2,150 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Holden FJ is equipped with a bigger engine.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet Epica | 1953 Holden FJ | |
Make | Chevrolet | Holden |
Model | Epica | FJ |
Year Released | 2009 | 1953 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 2150 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2620 mm |