2009 Chevrolet Epica vs. 1954 Maserati A6G
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Epica is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Maserati A6G. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Maserati A6G would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Maserati A6G (168 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 2009 Chevrolet Epica. (148 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1954 Maserati A6G should accelerate faster than 2009 Chevrolet Epica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chevrolet Epica weights approximately 895 kg more than 1954 Maserati A6G.
Because 1954 Maserati A6G is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Maserati A6G. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet Epica | 1954 Maserati A6G | |
Make | Chevrolet | Maserati |
Model | Epica | A6G |
Year Released | 2009 | 1954 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 1984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 7400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1635 kg | 740 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2320 mm |