2009 Chevrolet Epica vs. 1958 Chevrolet Impala
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Epica is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Chevrolet Impala. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Chevrolet Impala would be higher. At 3,851 cc (6 cylinders), 1958 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Chevrolet Impala weights approximately 5 kg more than 2009 Chevrolet Epica.
Because 1958 Chevrolet Impala is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Chevrolet Impala. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet Epica | 1958 Chevrolet Impala | |
Make | Chevrolet | Chevrolet |
Model | Epica | Impala |
Year Released | 2009 | 1958 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 3851 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1635 kg | 1640 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 2030 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 3030 mm |