2009 Chevrolet Epica vs. 1968 Renault 4
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Epica is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Renault 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Renault 4 would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Epica (148 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 115 more horse power than 1968 Renault 4. (33 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Epica should accelerate faster than 1968 Renault 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chevrolet Epica weights approximately 985 kg more than 1968 Renault 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Chevrolet Epica | 1968 Renault 4 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Renault |
| Model | Epica | 4 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1991 cc | 747 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 33 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1635 kg | 650 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 3670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2410 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.3 L/100km | 9.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 38 L |
