2009 Chevrolet Epica vs. 1972 Steyr 126
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Epica is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Steyr 126. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Steyr 126 would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Epica (148 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 124 more horse power than 1972 Steyr 126. (24 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Epica should accelerate faster than 1972 Steyr 126. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chevrolet Epica weights approximately 1050 kg more than 1972 Steyr 126. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1972 Steyr 126 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Steyr 126. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet Epica | 1972 Steyr 126 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Steyr |
Model | Epica | 126 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1972 |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 643 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 24 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1635 kg | 585 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 3060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1380 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 1850 mm |