2009 Chevrolet Epica vs. 1975 Simca 2 Litres
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Epica is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Simca 2 Litres. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Simca 2 Litres would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chevrolet Epica weights approximately 510 kg more than 1975 Simca 2 Litres.
Because 1975 Simca 2 Litres is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Simca 2 Litres. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet Epica | 1975 Simca 2 Litres | |
Make | Chevrolet | Simca |
Model | Epica | 2 Litres |
Year Released | 2009 | 1975 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 1981 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1635 kg | 1125 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2670 mm |