2009 Chevrolet Epica vs. 1982 GAZ 24
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Epica is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 GAZ 24. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 GAZ 24 would be higher. At 2,302 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 GAZ 24 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chevrolet Epica weights approximately 155 kg more than 1982 GAZ 24.
Because 1982 GAZ 24 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 GAZ 24. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Chevrolet Epica | 1982 GAZ 24 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | GAZ |
| Model | Epica | 24 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1991 cc | 2302 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1635 kg | 1480 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4740 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1500 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2810 mm |
