2009 Chevrolet Epica vs. 1998 Honda Integra
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Epica is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Honda Integra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Honda Integra would be higher. At 2,490 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Epica (154 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1998 Honda Integra. (143 HP @ 6300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Epica should accelerate faster than 1998 Honda Integra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chevrolet Epica weights approximately 376 kg more than 1998 Honda Integra. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Chevrolet Epica | 1998 Honda Integra | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Honda |
| Model | Epica | Integra |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1998 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2490 cc | 1834 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 154 HP | 143 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6300 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1575 kg | 1199 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4380 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1290 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2570 mm |
