2009 Chevrolet Epica vs. 2004 Nissan Titan
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Epica is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Nissan Titan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Nissan Titan would be higher. At 5,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Titan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan Titan (305 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 151 more horse power than 2009 Chevrolet Epica. (154 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Titan should accelerate faster than 2009 Chevrolet Epica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Titan weights approximately 823 kg more than 2009 Chevrolet Epica. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Nissan Titan is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Chevrolet Epica. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Titan will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Titan (514 Nm) has 277 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Chevrolet Epica. (237 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Titan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Chevrolet Epica.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet Epica | 2004 Nissan Titan | |
Make | Chevrolet | Nissan |
Model | Epica | Titan |
Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2490 cc | 5556 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 154 HP | 305 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 237 Nm | 514 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 77 mm | 98.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 89.2 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 9.8:1 |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1575 kg | 2398 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 5700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1950 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 3560 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.3 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 106 L |