2009 Chevrolet Epica vs. 2005 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Epica is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chevrolet Epica weights approximately 465 kg more than 2005 Nissan Bluebird.
Because 2005 Nissan Bluebird is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Chevrolet Epica. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Bluebird will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2005 Nissan Bluebird has automatic transmission and 2009 Chevrolet Epica has manual transmission. 2009 Chevrolet Epica will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Nissan Bluebird will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Chevrolet Epica | 2005 Nissan Bluebird | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Nissan |
| Model | Epica | Bluebird |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1991 cc | 1500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1635 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4480 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1450 mm |
