2009 Chevrolet Epica vs. 2012 BMW X5
To start off, 2012 BMW X5 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Chevrolet Epica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Chevrolet Epica would be higher. At 4,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 BMW X5 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2012 BMW X5 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Chevrolet Epica. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 BMW X5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Chevrolet Epica | 2012 BMW X5 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | BMW |
| Model | Epica | X5 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2490 cc | 4400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 154 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
| Drive Type | Front | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 7-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4851 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1994 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1763 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2933 mm |
