2009 Chevrolet Equinox vs. 1942 Skoda Superb
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 67 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Skoda Superb. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Skoda Superb would be higher. At 3,425 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Equinox is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Equinox (185 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 106 more horse power than 1942 Skoda Superb. (79 HP @ 3500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Equinox should accelerate faster than 1942 Skoda Superb. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1942 Skoda Superb weights approximately 251 kg more than 2009 Chevrolet Equinox.
Because 2009 Chevrolet Equinox is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1942 Skoda Superb. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Equinox will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet Equinox | 1942 Skoda Superb | |
Make | Chevrolet | Skoda |
Model | Equinox | Superb |
Year Released | 2009 | 1942 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3425 cc | 3137 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 185 HP | 79 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1549 kg | 1800 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 5210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1730 mm |