2009 Chevrolet Equinox vs. 1951 Jaguar MK V
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Jaguar MK V. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Jaguar MK V would be higher. At 3,483 cc (6 cylinders), 1951 Jaguar MK V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Equinox (185 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 1951 Jaguar MK V. (123 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Equinox should accelerate faster than 1951 Jaguar MK V. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Jaguar MK V weights approximately 414 kg more than 2009 Chevrolet Equinox.
Because 1951 Jaguar MK V is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Jaguar MK V. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Equinox, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet Equinox | 1951 Jaguar MK V | |
Make | Chevrolet | Jaguar |
Model | Equinox | MK V |
Year Released | 2009 | 1951 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3425 cc | 3483 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 185 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1261 kg | 1675 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1590 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2900 mm |