2009 Chevrolet Equinox vs. 1954 Ford 12 M
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Equinox is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Equinox (264 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 227 more horse power than 1954 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Equinox should accelerate faster than 1954 Ford 12 M.
Because 2009 Chevrolet Equinox is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1954 Ford 12 M. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Equinox will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Chevrolet Equinox has automatic transmission and 1954 Ford 12 M has manual transmission. 1954 Ford 12 M will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Chevrolet Equinox will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet Equinox | 1954 Ford 12 M | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Equinox | 12 M |
Year Released | 2009 | 1954 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3600 cc | 1172 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 264 HP | 37 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2500 mm |