2009 Chevrolet Equinox vs. 1960 DKW Munga
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 DKW Munga would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Equinox is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Equinox (264 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 221 more horse power than 1960 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Equinox should accelerate faster than 1960 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chevrolet Equinox weights approximately 151 kg more than 1960 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1960 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Chevrolet Equinox. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1960 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet Equinox | 1960 DKW Munga | |
Make | Chevrolet | DKW |
Model | Equinox | Munga |
Year Released | 2009 | 1960 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3600 cc | 980 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 264 HP | 43 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque RPM | 2300 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1261 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 3450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2010 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 31 L |