2009 Chevrolet Equinox vs. 1963 TVR Griffith
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 TVR Griffith. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 TVR Griffith would be higher. At 4,727 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 TVR Griffith is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chevrolet Equinox weights approximately 396 kg more than 1963 TVR Griffith.
Because 1963 TVR Griffith is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 TVR Griffith. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Equinox, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Chevrolet Equinox has automatic transmission and 1963 TVR Griffith has manual transmission. 1963 TVR Griffith will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Chevrolet Equinox will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet Equinox | 1963 TVR Griffith | |
Make | Chevrolet | TVR |
Model | Equinox | Griffith |
Year Released | 2009 | 1963 |
Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3600 cc | 4727 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 264 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1261 kg | 865 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 3560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2170 mm |